Skip to content

Since the method, not the mood

Strategic Liberty Coalition

Placeholder data. Every candidate on this site is fictional. Scores demonstrate the method. They are not live election advice.

Scorecard

Florida

Placeholder

Highest-power issue: Emergency misdemeanors. Current recommendation: Endorse Greta Solano.

  1. 1. Emergency misdemeanors · power 100
  2. 2. Convictionless forfeiture · power 80
  3. 3. Location warrants · power 80
  4. 4. Strict-liability misdemeanors · power 80

Governor

Placeholder

The governor signs or vetoes statutes, issues and withdraws executive orders, appoints agency heads, and proposes the budget. The office does not write a criminal penalty on its own.

Emergency misdemeanors

Placeholder. Jail for peaceful trade under an emergency order.

Harm
4
Reach
5
Office impact
5
Power
100

Conduct 4 and penalty severity 3 (Misdemeanor, up to a year) blend 60/40 into harm 4. Power 100 = 4 × 5 × 5.

Who can act

The governor holds the order. A favored candidate who would end it is a clear call.

Winnability is Greta Solano's chance in this office, 4 of 5. It is a property of the leading score, not of the statute. Greta Solano is fictional.

2026 gubernatorial election

Endorse Greta Solano

Placeholder.

Formula: Endorse Greta Solano (The lead clears the toss-up gap.)

Each segment is issue power times alignment. Alignment runs from −1 to +1. Right of zero, the candidate would narrow the penalty. Left of zero, they would keep or expand it. Fictional candidates.

Fictional candidate

Greta Solano

Limited-government placeholder · Winnability 4 · Score 115

Fictional placeholder. Not a real person. Would end the emergency order.

Fictional candidate

Hugh Palmer

Enforcement-first placeholder · Winnability 3 · Score -50

Fictional placeholder. Not a real person. Would keep it.

Solano is favored and would end the order. Palmer would not. Clear call. Fictional.

All calls for this state

Judiciary

Placeholder

Judges rule on warrants, constitutional limits, and how a penalty is applied. They do not rewrite a clear statute, and this scorecard does not ask them to.

Location warrants

Placeholder. Two judges, the same mild record.

Harm
4
Reach
4
Office impact
5
Power
80

Conduct 4 and penalty severity 4 (Felony imprisonment) blend 60/40 into harm 4. Power 80 = 4 × 4 × 5.

Who can act

The court can require a warrant. These two slates do not tell the voter which one will.

Winnability is Tessa Blum's chance in this office, 3 of 5. It is a property of the leading score, not of the statute. Tessa Blum is fictional.

2026 judicial elections

Toss-up

Placeholder tie on a serious issue.

Formula: Toss-up — The lead sits inside the toss-up gap. Leading score: Tessa Blum. (The lead sits inside the toss-up gap.)

Each segment is issue power times alignment. Alignment runs from −1 to +1. Right of zero, the candidate would narrow the penalty. Left of zero, they would keep or expand it. Fictional candidates.

Fictional candidate

Tessa Blum

Cautious-reform placeholder · Winnability 3 · Score 40

Fictional placeholder. Not a real person. A mild warrant record.

Fictional candidate

Oscar Ng

Cautious-reform placeholder · Winnability 3 · Score 40

Fictional placeholder. Not a real person. The same mild record.

Blum and Ng present the same record at the same odds. Toss-up. The warrant issue does not get a nominee it has not earned. Fictional.

All calls for this state

Legislature

Placeholder

The legislature drafts the statute, sets the penalty and the mental state, funds the agencies, and can sunset an emergency power. On most of these issues it holds the text.

Convictionless forfeiture

Placeholder. Property taken without a conviction.

Harm
4
Reach
4
Office impact
5
Power
80

Conduct 5 and penalty severity 2 (License, property, or forfeiture) blend 60/40 into harm 4. Power 80 = 4 × 4 × 5.

Who can act

The legislature writes the conviction rule.

Winnability is Lydia Crowe's chance in this office, 3 of 5. It is a property of the leading score, not of the statute. Lydia Crowe is fictional.

Strict-liability misdemeanors

Placeholder. Regulatory crimes with no knowledge element.

Harm
4
Reach
4
Office impact
5
Power
80

Conduct 4 and penalty severity 3 (Misdemeanor, up to a year) blend 60/40 into harm 4. Power 80 = 4 × 4 × 5.

Who can act

A default mental-state statute is a legislative act.

Winnability is Lydia Crowe's chance in this office, 3 of 5. It is a property of the leading score, not of the statute. Lydia Crowe is fictional.

2026 legislative elections

Endorse Lydia Crowe

Placeholder. Both slates lean the right way. One is substantially stronger.

Formula: Endorse Lydia Crowe (The lead clears the toss-up gap.)

Each segment is issue power times alignment. Alignment runs from −1 to +1. Right of zero, the candidate would narrow the penalty. Left of zero, they would keep or expand it. Fictional candidates.

Fictional candidate

Lydia Crowe

Limited-government placeholder · Winnability 3 · Score 120

Fictional placeholder. Not a real person. Full repeal on forfeiture, a narrower lean on mens rea.

Fictional candidate

Micah Benton

Cautious-reform placeholder · Winnability 3 · Score 80

Fictional placeholder. Not a real person. A one-step lean on both.

Both slates are better than an enforcement slate, and they are not the same. Crowe would require a conviction. Benton would only narrow the practice. The gap clears the toss-up rule at equal winnability. Editors endorse Crowe and publish Benton's lean so nobody thinks the other slate is the enemy. Fictional.

All calls for this state

Attorney general

Placeholder

The attorney general decides appeals, civil enforcement, and often whether the state will defend a statute. Charging power over ordinary crimes may sit with county attorneys. The entry says so when that split matters.

Forfeiture defense

Placeholder. The attorney general defends convictionless seizures.

Harm
4
Reach
3
Office impact
4
Power
48

Conduct 5 and penalty severity 2 (License, property, or forfeiture) blend 60/40 into harm 4. Power 48 = 4 × 3 × 4.

Who can act

Declining the defense changes the practice. Winnability at the floor is still an endorsement if the lead is otherwise clear. Editors say the floor out loud.

Winnability is Mina Kapoor's chance in this office, 2 of 5. It is a property of the leading score, not of the statute. Mina Kapoor is fictional.

2026 attorney general election

Endorse Mina Kapoor

Placeholder. Winnability sits on the endorsement floor.

Formula: Endorse Mina Kapoor (The lead clears the toss-up gap.)

Each segment is issue power times alignment. Alignment runs from −1 to +1. Right of zero, the candidate would narrow the penalty. Left of zero, they would keep or expand it. Fictional candidates.

Fictional candidate

Mina Kapoor

Limited-government placeholder · Winnability 2 · Score 33.6

Fictional placeholder. Not a real person. An outside chance. Would stop defending convictionless seizures.

Fictional candidate

Colin Drewe

Enforcement-first placeholder · Winnability 4 · Score -27.6

Fictional placeholder. Not a real person. Favored, and would keep the defense.

Kapoor's winnability is a 2, which is the minimum the formula will endorse. Drewe is more likely to win and would keep defending convictionless forfeiture. Editors endorse Kapoor because the alternative is an active defense of the penalty, and they tell the reader this is an outside chance. Below a 2 they would have called a toss-up instead. She is fictional.

All calls for this state