Skip to content

Since the method, not the mood

Strategic Liberty Coalition

Placeholder data. Every candidate on this site is fictional. Scores demonstrate the method. They are not live election advice.

Calls

Endorsements and toss-ups

A clear endorsement names a fictional candidate when the record and the odds both support it. A toss-up is the honest call when they do not. Every card has a reason. Where editors depart from the formula, the card says so.

4 endorsements · 0 toss-ups · filtered to TX

EndorsementPlaceholder

Texas · Governor

2026 gubernatorial election

Endorse Harlow Singh

Formula: Endorse Harlow Singh

Singh is not a maximal reformer on the emergency order — the alignment is a one, not a two — and Holm is more likely to win. The forfeiture difference is large, the weighted scores still separate cleanly, and winnability of 3 clears the floor. Editors endorse Singh and say out loud that the emergency half of the record is only a lean. Both candidates are fictional.

Open the Texas scorecard

EndorsementPlaceholder

Texas · Attorney general

2026 attorney general election

Endorse Ida Pell

Formula: Endorse Ida Pell

If the attorney general owns the forfeiture docket, Pell is the strategic vote: favored, and committed to stopping convictionless filings. Abern would expand them. The model is a placeholder — real attorney general powers vary — and the call is only as good as that premise. Pell is not a real candidate.

Open the Texas scorecard

EndorsementPlaceholder

Texas · Legislature

2026 legislative elections

Endorse Esther Cho

Formula: Endorse Esther Cho

Cho is favored and is on the right side of both statutes this office writes. Kerr would add license crimes. Unlike the New Hampshire legislative toss-up, winnability here is a 4, so the 'one seat is not a majority' caution does not erase the call. It does limit it: an endorsement of a slate is not a promise the bill will pass. Cho is fictional.

Open the Texas scorecard

EndorsementPlaceholder

Texas · Judiciary

2026 judicial elections

Endorse June Pellham

Formula: Endorse June Pellham

The formula endorses Pellham because Geddes has no record and Pellham has a one-step lean, at equal winnability. Editors agree, and they say the agreement is only as strong as that one step. This is not a mandate. It is a refusal to treat a blank slate and a mildly better slate as the same choice. Both are fictional.

Open the Texas scorecard